Motivations for Reading

Young children listening to read aloud on the library carpet

Reading motivation isn't a simple matter of desire to read, because there are many different reasons for this desire. This article describes several motivations for reading, both intrinsic (internal) and extrinsic (external.)

Motivations for reading are internalized reasons for reading which activate cognitive operations that enable the individual to perform such acts as acquiring knowledge, enjoying aesthetic experiences, performing tasks, and participating in social contexts.

Motivation for reading is discussed here in the plural. Several different motivations are expected to be useful in characterizing students' school-relevant reading, including

  • Curiosity, as in the desire to learn about a topic
  • Aesthetic involvement, as in the enjoyment of experiencing a literary text
  • Challenge, as in the orientation to learning complex ideas from text
  • Recognition, as in the gratification in receiving a tangible form of reward for success in reading
  • Grades, as in favorable evaluations from a teacher

These dimensions are based on the work on intrinsic motivation (Deci et al., 1991), values and goals (Wigfield & Eccles, 1992), and flow experiences (Czikszentmihalyi, 1978) that encompass both intrinsic (curiosity, aesthetic involvement, and challenge) and more extrinsic (recognition, grades) aspects of motivation.

We include different kinds of intrinsic motivation specific to reading, in particular the notion of aesthetic satisfaction. We also distinguish different kinds of extrinsic motivation for reading, reflecting the fact that children do much of their reading in school where work is evaluated and grades and recognition become salient.

Our proposed motivations for reading also include: social, processes of constructing and sharing meanings in groups; and compliance, adaptation to an external goal or requirement.

With the exception of Wentzel's (1989) work in the general motivation literature and in-depth case studies of adults' purposes and interests in reading (Gray & Rogers, 1956), the social goals for reading have been infrequently discussed. But social motivations seem essential for reading since students read in groups during instruction and share texts in many social situations.

In addition, teachers often have management goals, such as finishing a certain number of pages in a certain time period, which may become internalized by the students as a compliance motivation.

We further propose that reading efficacy, the belief that one can be successful at reading, is vital to becoming an active reader. Reading efficacy refers to students' perceptions of themselves as competent readers and learners, which are associated with academic achievement.

Paris, Wasik, and Turner (1991) reviewed literature indicating that students who have a sense of control over their own learning achieve more and are more active in school than other students. Bandura and others have shown that self-efficacy, which is a belief in probable success, is associated with high performance in complex reading tasks and in mathematics (Schunk & Rice, 1987).

Motivations for reading may change over time in strength, number, or type. We suggest that reading motivations that are more intrinsic (curiosity, aesthetic involvement, challenge, social, self-efficacy) will increase in number and strength across time as a student becomes a more active reader. Students who become less active readers will diminish in the number and strength of their intrinsic motivations for reading.

Conversely, extrinsic motivations (compliance, grades, recognition) will decrease in strength as students become more active readers.


Click the "References" link above to hide these references.

Adoni, H., & Shadmi, E. (1980). The portrait of the citizen as a young reader: The functions of books in the political socialization of youth in Israel. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 121-137.

Almasi, J. F. (1993). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (l984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-293). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285-303.

Archambault, R. D. (Ed.) (1964). John Dewey on Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Au, K. H., & Mason, J. M. (1981). Social organizational factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(1), 115-152.

Beach, R., & Hynds, S. (1991). Research on response to literature. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 453-489). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting, and learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.

Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. In M. Lepper & D. Green (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation (pp. 205-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 264-274.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychology, 26, 325-346.

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.

Fillion, B. (1981). Reading as inquiry: An approach to literature learning. English Journal, 1, 39-45.

Foertsch, M. A. (1992). Reading in and out of school: Factors influencing the literacy achievement of American students in grades 4, 8, and 12, in 1988 and 1990. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.

Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-33.

Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1992). Taking students seriously. In F. M. Newman (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gaskins, I., Guthrie, J. T., Satlow, E., Ostertag, F., Six, L., Byrne, J., & Conner, B. (in press). Integrating instruction of science and reading/writing processes: Goals, assessments, and teacher development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Glynn, S. M., Yeaney, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). A constructivist view of learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeaney, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gray, W. S., & Rogers, B. (1956). Maturity in reading: Its nature and appraisal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Greaney, V., & Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisure-time reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 3-20.

Guthrie, J. T., & Greaney, V. (1991). Literacy acts. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 68-96). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Hutchinson, S. R. (1991). Relations of document literacy and prose literacy to occupational and societal characteristics of young black and white adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 30-48.

Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W., Wang, Y., & Afflerbach, P. (1993). Influences of instruction on amount of reading: An empirical exploration of social, cognitive, and instructional indicators. (Reading Research Report No. 3). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, Universities of Georgia and Maryland.

Hiebert, E. H., & Fisher, C. W. (1990, March). Whole language: Three themes for the future. Educational Leadership, pp. 62-64.

Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1989). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Stanne, M. B., & Garibaldi, J. (1990). Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130(4), 507-516.

LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. New York: Academic Press.

Mikulecky, L. (1987). The status of literacy in our society. Research in literacy: Merging perspectives, Thirty-sixth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 211-237). Chicago: National Reading Conference.

Morrow, L. M. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature, and attitudes of children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 250-275.

Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.

Paris, S., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

Pintrich, P., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in the classroom. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pressley, M., Schuder, T., Teachers in the Students Achieving Independent Learning Program, Bergman, J. L., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1992). A researcher/educator collaborative interview study of transactional comprehension strategies instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 231-246.

Reif, F., & Allen, S. (1992). Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, 9(1), 1-44.

Roehler, L. R. (1992). Embracing the instructional complexities of reading instruction. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school. New York: Academic Press.

Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehension skills and self-efficacy with strategy value information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 285-302.

Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211-230

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402-433.

Stevenson, C., & Carr, J. F. (Eds.). (1993) Integrated studies in the middle grades. New York: Teachers College Press.

Wentzel, K. (1989). Adolescent classroom grades, standards for performance, and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 131-142.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.

Adapted from: Guthrie, J. T., Bennett, L., McGough, K.(Winter, 1994). Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction: An Integrated Curriculum to Develop Motivations and Strategies for Reading. Reading Research Report No. 10. National Reading Research Center. University of Georgia and University of Maryland.


You are welcome to print copies for non-commercial use, or a limited number for educational purposes, as long as credit is given to Reading Rockets and the author(s). For commercial use, please contact the author or publisher listed.

Add comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
"So please, oh PLEASE, we beg, we pray, go throw your TV set away. And in its place you can install, a lovely bookshelf on the wall." — Roald Dahl