Promoting Family Involvement
There are often challenges to creating strong family and school partnerships. Here are tips for schools to face these challenges in order to make parents feel more comfortable and get more involved in their children's education.
Schools can take a number of steps to promote partnerships with families. These can ease teachers' responsibilities or give them better ways to relate to parents.
Recognize the disconnection
While many parents have strong feelings of support for the schools their children actually attend, with 70 percent of all public school parents giving their children's school a grade of A or B, there still is a strong feeling of disconnection with public education in general (Elam, Lowell, & Gallup 1994).
Many families feel that their interests are not fully taken into account by educators. At times, parents feel that educators talk down to them or speak in educational jargon they do not understand, while the majority of teachers feel that parents need to be more engaged in the education of their child (Peter D. Hart 1994).
Train teachers to work with parents
Schools and school systems seldom offer staff any formal training in collaborating with parents or in understanding the varieties of modern family life. However, both the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers are working to make such information and skills widely available.
Reduce distrust and cultural barriers
Often the first time a parent comes to school is when a child is in trouble. Schools can reduce distrust and cultural barriers between families and teachers by arranging contacts in neutral settings. These might include using resource centers, offering informal learning sessions, conducting home visits by family liaison personnel, and holding meetings off school grounds.
Since the first contact a parent has with his or her child's school is often negative, some districts are making sure the first contact with parents is a positive one.
Address language barriers
Reaching families whose first language is not English requires schools to make special accommodations. Translating materials into their first language can be useful for these parents, but written communications alone are not enough. Ideally, a resource person, perhaps another parent, would be available who could communicate with parents in their first language either face-to-face or by telephone. Interactive telephone voice-mail systems that have bilingual recordings for families also are useful.
Evaluate parents’ needs
Schools can also bridge the distance between families and schools by surveying parents to find out their concerns and opinions about school. Surveys can be especially helpful to assess further changes needed after a school has implemented a program promoting parental involvement.
Accommodate families’ work schedule
Many schools hold evening and weekend meetings and conferences before school to accommodate families' work schedules. By remaining open in the afternoons and evenings and on weekends, schools can promote various recreational and learning activities for parents, including adult education and parenthood training, and can create a safe haven against neighborhood crime.
Use technology to link parents to the classroom
Schools are using a number of new technologies to communicate with families and students after school hours. One widespread arrangement is a districtwide homework hotline to help guide students with assignments.
In addition, voice mail systems have been installed in several hundred schools across the country. Parents and students can call for taped messages from teachers describing classroom activities and daily homework assignments. Audio and video messages also are being used as alternatives to written communication for parents. These are especially helpful in reaching families who do not read.
Make school visits easier
Free transportation and child care can especially encourage families in low-income and unsafe neighborhoods to attend school functions. Native speakers of languages other than English, interpreters, and materials translated in their own language can help non-English-speaking parents participate in the schools more fully. A variety of techniques including letters, phone calls, and visits by program staff may be needed to recruit low-income parents and parents who lack confidence in dealing with the schools (Goodson, Schwartz, & Millsap 1991; Moles 1993).
Establish a home-school coordinator
A parent liaison or home-school coordinator can develop parental involvement programs without adding to the workload of teachers. Personal contacts, especially from people in the community, are important in encouraging hard-to-reach families, including immigrants, to participate (Goodson, Swartz, & Millsap 1991; Nicolau & Ramos 1990).
Many of the most effective parent-school partnership programs combine multiple strategies. In order to expand opportunities for school-family contacts, these schools have developed resource centers for parents in schools, home visiting programs, and mentoring programs (Davies, Burch, & Johnson 1991).
Encourage family learning
Traditional homework assignments can be converted into more interactive ones involving family members. For example, students might interview family members on historical events or their daily work.
Give parents a voice in school decisions
The parental involvement goal explicitly states, "Parents and families will help to ensure that schools are adequately supported and will hold schools and teachers to high standards of accountability." Many parents, especially those who have limited proficiency in English or who distrust the schools, may be reluctant to get involved to this extent. But this kind of participation is an important component of efforts to increase parental involvement.
Schools can give families the opportunity to support the improvement efforts of schools and teachers. In recent years, a number of school systems have established new governance arrangements.
Thus many schools are creating new arrangements for working with parents, finding ways to make communication with families more personal and compatible with their needs, drawing on new technologies, and using parents in new ways in the schools. But these new family-school partnerships need continuing support from other members of the society, including community organizations, businesses, and government at all levels.
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Anderson, R. C., Heibert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). BECOMING A NATION OF READERS: THE REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON READING. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
Andrus, Cecil D, Governor of Idaho. (1994). Personal correspondence.
Barton, P.E., & Coley, R.J. (1992). AMERICA'S SMALLEST SCHOOL: THE FAMILY. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bastian, L. & Taylor, B. (1991). SCHOOL CRIME: A NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY REPORT. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Bauch, J. P. (1993). A SAMPLER OF PROJECTS AND RESULTS -- THE TRANSPARENT SCHOOL MODEL 1987-1993. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Betty Phillips Center for Parenthood Education.
Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), CHILD DEVELOPMENT TODAY AND TOMORROW. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Becher, R. (1984). PARENT INVOLVEMENT: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH AND PRINCIPLES OF SUCCESSFUL PRACTICE. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Bempechat, J. (1992). The role of parent involvement in children's academic achievement. SCHOOL COMMUNITY JOURNAL, 2(2), 31-4.
Berla, N., Henderson, A., & Kerewsky, W. (1989). THE MIDDLE SCHOOL YEARS: A PARENT'S HANDBOOK. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Berrueta-Clement, J. R., Schweinhart, L., Barnett, W., Epstein, W., and Weikart, D. (1984). CHANGED LIVES: THE EFFECTS OF THE PERRY PRESCHOOL PROGRAM ON YOUTHS THROUGH AGE 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). A REPORT ON LONGITUDINAL EVALUATIONS OF PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS, VOL. II: IS EARLY INTERVENTION EFFECTIVE? Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Office of Child Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 093 501).
Caplan, N., Choy, M. H., & Whitmore, J. K. (1992). Indochinese refugee families and academic achievement. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 266(2).
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1994). A MATTER OF TIME: RISK AND OPPORTUNITY IN THE NONSCHOOL HOURS. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Chapin Hall Center for Children. (1992). COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR STUDENTS: A NEW LOOK AT THEIR ROLE AND IMPORTANCE AND A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THEIR DISTRIBUTION ACROSS COMMUNITIES. Chicago: Author.
Children's Aid Society. (n.d.). THE WASHINGTON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PROJECT. PROGRESS REPORT, OCTOBER 1992 TO JUNE 1993. New York: Author.
Children's Defense Fund. (1994). THE STATE OF AMERICA'S CHILDREN: YEARBOOK 1994. Washington, DC: Author.
Chimerine, C. B., Panton, K. L. M., & Russo, A. W. W. (1993). THE OTHER 91 PERCENT: STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF OUT-OF-SCHOOL EXPERIENCES OF CHAPTER 1 STUDENTS. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
Choy, S. P., Henke, R. R., Alt, M. N., Hedrich, E. A., & Bobbitt, S. A. SCHOOLS AND STAFFING IN THE UNITED STATES: A STATISTICAL PROFILE, 1990-91. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Clark, R. M. (1988). Parents as providers of linguistic and social capital. EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS, 66(2), 93-95.
Clark, R. M. (1990). Why disadvantaged students succeed. PUBLIC WELFARE, pp. 17-23. Spring.
Clinton, W. J. (1994). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Expanding family-friendly work arrangements in the executive branch. Washington, DC: The White House. July 11.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). EQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
College Board. (1994). COLLEGE-BOUND SENIORS OF 1994: INFORMATION ON STUDENTS WHO TOOK THE SAT AND ACHIEVEMENT TESTS OF THE COLLEGE BOARD. New York, NY: Author.
Comer, J. P. (1988). Educating poor minority children. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 259(5), 42-48.
Conference Board. (1994). Job sharing. WORK-FAMILY ROUNDTABLE, 4 (2).
Cooper, H. (1989). HOMEWORK. White Plains, NY: Longman.
D'Angelo, D. (1991). PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN CHAPTER 1: A REPORT TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL. Hampton, NH: RMC Research Corporation.
Dauber, S. L., & Epstein, J. L. (1993). Parents' attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), FAMILIES AND SCHOOLS IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY (pp. 53-72). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Davies, D. (1988). Benefits and barriers to parent involvement. COMMUNITY EDUCATION RESEARCH DIGEST, 2(2), 11-19.
Davies, D., Burch, P., & Johnson, V. (1991). A PORTRAIT OF SCHOOLSREACHING OUT: REPORT OF A SURVEY ON PRACTICES AND POLICIES OFFAMILY-COMMUNITY-SCHOOL COLLABORATION. Boston, MA: Institute forResponsive Education.
de Kanter, A., Ginsburg, A. L., & Milne, A. M. (1987). PARENT INVOLVEMENT STRATEGIES: A NEW EMPHASIS ON TRADITIONAL PARENT ROLES. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
DESIGNS FOR CHANGE. (1993). Issues in Restructuring Schools. Author, 5. Fall.
EDUCATION DAILY. (1994). NEA kicks off effort to get parents involved in school. Author. July 11.
Elkind, D. (1993). PARENTING YOUR TEENAGER IN THE '90s. Rosemont, NJ: Modern Learning Press.
Elam, S.M., Lowell, C.R., and Gallup, A.M. (1994),. The 26th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, September.
Entwisle, D. & Alexander, K. (1992). Summer setback: Race, proverty, school composition, a mathematics achievement in the first 2 years of school. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 57, 72-84.
Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parents' reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 86, 277-294.
Epstein, J. L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. EDUCATION AND URBAN SOCIETY, 19, 119-36. February.
Epstein, J. L. (1991a). Effects on student achievement of teacherpractices of parent involvement. In S. Silvern (Ed.), ADVANCES INREADING/LANGUAGE RESEARCH, VOL. 5. LITERACY THROUGH FAMILY, COMMUNITYAND SCHOOL INTERACTION. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Epstein, J. L. (1991b). Paths to partnership: What we can learn from federal, state, district, and school initiatives. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 72 (5), 344-349. January.
Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (1992). MANUAL FOR TEACHERS: TEACHERS INVOLVE PARENTS IN SCHOOLWORK (TIPS) MATH AND SCIENCE INTERACTIVE HOMEWORK IN THE ELEMENTARY GRADES. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning.
ERIC. (1990). Guidelines for family television viewing. ERIC DIGEST. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
Families and Work Institute. (1994). EMPLOYERS, FAMILIES, AND EDUCATION: FACILITATING FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN LEARNING. New York: Author.
Family Service America. (n.d.). FAMILIES TOGETHER WITH SCHOOLS. Milwaukee, WI: Author.
Fathernet information available from: Children, Youth, and Family Consortium, 12 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108, or via e-mail at [email protected]
Finney, P. (1993). The PTA/Newsweek national education survey. NEWSWEEK. May 17.
Freedman, M. (1994). SENIORS IN NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE: A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE COMMONWEALTH FUND'S AMERICANS OVER 55 AT WORK PROGRAM. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Fruchter, N., Galletta, A., & White, J. L. (1992). NEW DIRECTIONS IN PARENT INVOLVEMENT. New York: Academy for Educational Development.
Furano, K., Roaf, P. A., Styles, M. B., & Branch, A. Y. (1993). BIG BROTHERS/BIG SISTERS: A STUDY OF PROGRAM PRACTICES. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Ferguson, S., Outreach coordinator for the National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. (1994). Personal correspondence.
Goodson, B. D., Swartz, J. P., & Millsap, M. A. (1991). WORKING WITH FAMILIES: PROMISING PROGRAMS TO HELP PARENTS SUPPORT YOUNG CHILDREN'S LEARNING. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Gorman, T. (1993). Parents help with reading -- but quit too soon. AMERICAN TEACHER. February.
Gotts, E. E. (1982). SCHOOL-FAMILY RELATIONS PROGRAM. Final (annual) report. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
Hanson, S. L., & Ginsburg, A. (1985). Gaining ground: Values and high school success. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education.
Henderson, A. (1987). THE EVIDENCE CONTINUES TO GROW: PARENT INVOLVEMENT IMPROVES STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (1994). A NEW GENERATION OF EVIDENCE: THE FAMILY IS CRITICAL TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Henderson, A. T., Marburger, C. L., & Ooms, T. (1986). BEYOND THE BAKE SALE: AN EDUCATOR'S GUIDE TO WORKING WITH PARENTS. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Heyns, B (1988). Summer programs and compensatory education: The future of an idea. In B. I. Williams, P.A. Richmond, & B.J. Mason, (eds.), DESIGNS FOR COMPENSATORY EDUCATION: CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS AND PAPERS. Washington, DC: Research and Evaluation Associates.
Hill, Alan T., President of the Corporation for Educational Technology. (1994). Personal correspondence. Hughes, E., Administrator for Education Support Services, McAllen Independent School District. (1994). Personal Correspondence.
Ingrassia, M. (1993). Growing up fast and frightened. NEWSWEEK, November 22.
Johnson, V. (1993). Parent centers send clear message: Come be a partner in educating your children. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT. (September, No. 4). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning.
Kagan, S. L., & Neville, P. (1993). INTEGRATING SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: UNDERSTANDING THE PAST TO SHAPE THE FUTURE. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Keith, T. Z., & Keith, P. B. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 22(3), 474-496.
Lee, V. E., & Croninger, R. G. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 102 (3), 286-329.
Leler, H. (1983). Parent education and involvement in relation to the schools and to parents of school-aged children. In R. Haskins & D. Adams (Eds.), PARENT EDUCATION AND PUBLIC POLICY. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Levin, H. M. (1989) ACCELERATED SCHOOLS AFTER THREE YEARS. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for Educational Research.
Lewis, A. (1994). Director of Programs, National Urban League. Personal coorespondence.
Liontos, L. B. (1992). AT-RISK FAMILIES AND SCHOOLS BECOMING PARTNERS. Eugene: University of Oregon, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
Louis Harris and Associates. (1987). THE METROPOLITAN LIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER: STRENGTHENING LINKS BETWEEN HOME AND SCHOOL. New York: Author.
Louis Harris and Associates. (1993). METROPOLITAN LIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER 1993: VIOLENCE IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. New York: Author.
Lueder, D. C. (1989). Tennessee parents were invited to participate -- and they did. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 47(2), 15-17.
Maine Meeting Place information available from the Maine Meeting Place Project, c/o York County Parent Awareness, Inc., 150 Main St., Midtown Mall, Sanford, ME 04073, or via e-mail at: [email protected]
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (1989). MASS MUTUAL FAMILY VALUES STUDY. Spingfield, MA; Author.
McLaughlin, M. (1994). URBAN SANCTUARIES. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Melaville, A. I., & Blank, M. J. (1993). TOGETHER WE CAN: A GUIDE FOR CRAFTING A PRO-FAMILY SYSTEM OF EDUCTION AND HUMAN SERVICES. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Informational brochure on the Parent Leadership Program. National Headquarters, 634 South Spring, 11th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90014.
Michael, B. (1990). VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Moles, O. C. (1993). Collaboration between schools and disadvantaged parents: Obstacles and openings. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), FAMILIES AND SCHOOLS IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Morra, L. G. (1994). School-age children: Poverty and diversity challenge schools nationwide. Testimony before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources and the Subcommittee on Education, Arts, and Humanities, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office. March 16, 1994.
Mullis, I.V.S., Campbell, J.R., Farstrup, A.E. (1993). NAEP 1992 READING REPORT CARD FOR THE NATION AND STATES. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Mullis, I.V. S., Dossey, J. A., Campbell, J. R., Gentile, C. A., O'Sullivan, C., Latham, A.S. (1994). NAEP 1992 TRENDS IN ACADEMIC PROGRESS. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Murray, J., & Connberg, B. (1992). CHILDREN AND TELEVISION: A PRIMER FOR PARENTS. Boys Town, NE: Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.
National Commission on Children.(1991). SPEAKING OF KIDS: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF CHILDREN AND PARENTS. Washington, DC: Author.
National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (1994). PRISONERS OF TIME. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Education Goals Panel. (1993). THE NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS REPORT: BUILDING A NATION OF LEARNERS. Washington, DC: U.S. Governement Printing Office.
National Parent Information Network (NPIN)information available from: Lilian G. Katz, ERIC/EECE, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, 805 W. Pennsylvania Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801-4897, 1-800-583-4135.
National Research Council. (1993). UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING VIOLENCE. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Urban League. (n.d.). PARTNERS FOR REFORM IN SCIENCE AND MATH (PRISM). New York: Author.
Nicolau, S., & Ramos, C. L. (1990). TOGETHER IS BETTER: BUILDING STRONG RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SCHOOLS AND HISPANIC PARENTS. New York: Hispanic Policy Development Project.
Pelavin, S.H., & Kane, M.B. (1990). CHANGING THE ODDS: FACTORS INCREASING ACCESS TO COLLEGE. New York: College Entrance Board.
Pelavin Associates, Inc. (1993). EQUITY 2000 NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. Washington, DC: Author.
Perez-Ortega, L. (1994). PARENT LEADERSHIP PROGRAM. Los Angeles: Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Perry, N. (1993). School reform: Big pain, little gain. FORTUNE, 128, November 29 , 130-138.
Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc. (1994). Internal AFT Survey of elementary and secondary school teachers' views on school reform. April.
Pfannensteil, J., Lambson, T., & Yarnell, V. (1991). SECOND WAVE STUDY OF THE PARENTS AS TEACHERS PROGRAM. St. Louis: Parents as Teachers National Center.
Powledge, T. (1994). Information highway without tollbooths: Maryland is the first state to offer free access to the Internet. WASHINGTON POST, June 23.
Puma, M. J., Jones, C. C., Rock, D., & Fernandez, R. (1993). PROSPECTS: THE CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED STUDY OF EDUCATIONAL GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY. INTERIM REPORT. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
Radcliffe, B., Malone, M., & Nathan, J. (1994). TRAINING FOR PARENT PARTNERSHIP: MUCH MORE SHOULD BE DONE. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Center for School Change.
Radin, N. (1969). The impact of a kindergarten home counseling program. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 3, 18-26.
Radin, N. (1972). Three degrees of maternal involvement in a preschool program: Impact on mothers and children. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 4, 1355-1364.
Rich, D. (1988). MEGASKILLS: HOW FAMILIES CAN HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED IN SCHOOL AND BEYOND. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rioux, J. W., & Berla, N. (1993). INNOVATIONS IN PARENT AND FAMILY INVOLVEMENT. Princeton Junction, NJ: Eye on Education.
Ripley, S. (1993). A PARENT'S GUIDE: ACCESSING PARENT GROUPS. Washington, DC: National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities.
Rutherford, B., Billig, S. H., & Kettering, J. F. (in press). Evaluating education reform: Parent and community involvement in the middle grades. Literature review. In B. Rutherford (Ed.), SCHOOL/FAMILY PARTNERSHIPS. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Salganik, M. W. (1994). Making connections between families and schools. R&D PREVIEW, 9 (3), 2-3.
Scott, R., & Davis, A. (1979). PRESCHOOL EDUCATION AND BUSING: DO WE HAVE OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT? Paper presented at the meeting of the National Urban Education Association. November.
Scott-Jones, D. (1984). Family influences on cognitive development and school achievement. REVIEW OF EDUCATION RESEARCH, 11, 259-304.
Shartrand, A., Kreider, H., & Erickson-Warfield, M. (in press). PREPARING TEACHERS TO INVOLVE PARENTS: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
Singer, J. L., Singer, D.G., Desmond, R., Hirsch, B., Nichol, A. (1988). Family mediation and children's cognition, aggression and comprehension of television: A longitudinal study. JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 9, 347.
Snyder, T. D., & Fromboluti, C. S. (1993). YOUTH INDICATORS 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Solomon, Z. P. (1991). California's policy on parent involvement: State leadership for local initiatives. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 72(5), 359-362.
Sopris West. (1993). EDUCATION PROGRAMS THAT WORK. 19th edition. Longmont, CO: Author.
St. Pierre, R., Swartz, J., Gamse, B., Murray, S., Deck, D., & Nickel, P. (1994). NATIONAL EVALUATION OF THE EVEN START FAMILY LITERACY PROGRAM. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Stevenson, D. L. & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child's school performance. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 58, 1348-1357.
Stevenson, H. (1993). EXTRACURRICULAR PROGRAMS IN EAST ASIAN SCHOOLS. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: MARCH 1993 AND 1992. Current population reports, P20-476. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education. (1987). WHAT WORKS: RESEARCH ABOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). GROWING UP DRUG FREE: A PARENT'S GUIDE TO PREVENTION. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993a). REACHING THE GOALS: GOAL 6. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993b). SUMMER CHALLENGE: MODEL SUMMER PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994a). Calculations based on information from the 1994 Condition of Education, the 1993 Digest of Education Statistics, and the 1993 Statistical Abstract of the United States.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994b). Personal conversation with teachers in the shadow teacher program at the U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
University of Michigan. (1994). MONITORING THE FUTURE. Ann Arbor, MI: Author, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.
Utah Center for Families in Education. (n.d.). FAMILY EDUCATION PLAN TRAINING: UTAH NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. Salt Lake City: Author.
Walberg, H. J. (1984). Families as partners in educational productivity. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 65, 397-400.
Walberg, H. J. (n.d.). Family programs for academic learning. Prepared for the Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Department of Education.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 63, 3.
White, B. L. (1987). Education begins at birth. PRINCIPAL, 66 (5).
White, B. L. (1988). EDUCATING THE INFANT AND TODDLER. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
White, V. (1994). Unpublished material from survey of state legislative activities on parental involvement. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.
Wilson, J.Q. (1994). What to do about crime. COMMENTARY. 98 (3), 25-34.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (1994). FAMILY-COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SCHOOLS. Madison: Author.
Adapted from: Strong Families, Strong Schools. Online book prepared by ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education. Based on Ballen, J., & Moles, O. (September, 1994). Strong Families, Strong Schools: Building Community Partnerships for Learning. National Family Initiative, U.S. Department of Education. Full text available at eric-web.tc.columbia.edu.
I live in south africa. Here parent education is just talked about but no action.I am starting a project to educate parents and develop a positive relationship between parents and the school. My focus is in early childhood ages 2 to 5 years.