High-Quality Preschool: Why We Need It and What It Looks Like
Many of our most vulnerable children attend the lowest quality programs, and children who are at risk for school failure are more strongly influenced by the quality of preschool. Many children from middle-class families also attend preschools that are not of good quality. Momentum is building across the country to develop more preschool programs. Therefore, it's crucial to have a clear vision of what high-quality preschool programs look like.
Rating preschool quality
Preschool programs are typically rated on two dimensions of quality — process and structure. The interactions, activities, materials, learning opportunities, and health and safety routines are observed and rated as a measure of process quality. The second dimension, structural quality, includes the size of each group of children, the adult-child ratio, and the education and training of the teachers and staff.
The most widely used instrument for measuring process quality in early education programs shows that fewer than half the programs measured enjoy a "good" to "excellent" rating.
Dimensions of a high-quality preschool program
This brief uses the latest research findings and best practices recommended by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)to describe the features of a high-quality preschool program in terms of what's critical for the child, family, teacher, curriculum, and classroom.
It is commonly accepted that children who attend preschool are more likely to succeed in kindergarten than those who do not. Participating in early education can also provide academic and social benefits that last well beyond kindergarten. However, researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that for children — particularly children from low-income backgrounds — to benefit from preschool, it must be of high quality.
Two influential studies on the effects of intensive, high-quality early childhood programs have demonstrated that these programs benefit disadvantaged children academically and socially into adulthood. Unfortunately, research indicates most of America's young children are not attending high-quality preschool programs. Most programs for which researchers have studied quality were rated below the minimum for a preschool program to be judged "good."
Additionally, children from the lowest income families are found more likely to attend lower-quality programs. Children who are at risk for school failure benefit the most from good early education, but they are the least likely to get it. Furthermore, many children from middle-class families also attend preschool programs of mediocre quality.
It is imperative that policy makers work to raise the overall quality of preschool education, targeting America's most vulnerable children first.
The research is clear that investing in high-quality preschool education will benefit children and is worth the cost. But before we make this investment, we must have a clear vision of what high-quality preschool programs look like.
How do we define and measure quality in early education?
This brief defines preschool as center-based programs that provide educational experiences for children during the year or years preceding kindergarten. They can be located in a child-care center, state pre-kindergarten, private preschool, or Head Start center.
In the United States, 76% of children ages three and four receive education and care from someone other than a parent. The majority (58%) attend a center-based program defined as preschool, child care, or Head Start. What do we know about the level of quality in these programs?
Two generally accepted approaches to measuring the quality of early childhood programs focus on process and structure.
Process quality emphasizes the actual experiences that occur in educational settings, such as child-teacher interactionsand the types of activities in which children are engaged. Process measures can also include health and safety provisions as well as materials available and relationships with parents.
Process quality is typically measured by observing the experiences in the center and classrooms and rating the multiple dimensions of the program, such as teacher-child interactions, type of instruction, room environment, materials, relationships with parents, and health and safety routines. The Early Childhood Environmental Rating Scale (ECERS) has been widely used in early education research to measure process quality. The revised edition includes 43 items organized into seven areas of center-based care for children aged 2.5 through 5 years. The areas are: personal care routines, space and furnishings, language-reasoning, interaction, activities, program structure, and parents and staff. Each item has detailed descriptors and can be rated from 1-7, with (1) inadequate, (3) minimal, (5) good, and (7) excellent.
When the activities and interactions are rated higher, children develop more advanced language and math abilities, as well as social skills. Conversely, poorer process quality has been linked to increased behavior problems.
Furthermore, these benefits in cognitive and social development last well into the elementary years. A longitudinal study of the short- and long-term effects of center-based care on children's development concluded: "High-quality child care experiences, in terms of both classroom practices and teacher-child relationships, enhance children's abilities to take advantage of the educational opportunities in school."
The second way to measure quality is to review the structural and teacher characteristics of the program, such as teacher-child ratios, class size, qualifications and compensation of teachers and staff, and square footage. The structural features of a program are thought to contribute to quality in more indirect ways than process features. Structural features are frequently regulated through state licensing requirements.
Researchers have consistently found that these two sets of indicators — process and structure — are related, and influence the quality of the educational experiences for children. For example, when groups are smaller, teachers tend to have more positive, supportive, and stimulating interactions with children. Warm and nurturing interactions are directly linked to children's social competence and future academic success, and such interactions are essential to high quality. Early childhood teachers who are more highly qualified and have smaller groups can more effectively provide individualized, responsive learning opportunities. Finally, higher teacher wages have consistently been linked to higher process quality.
Ratios, an indicator of structural quality, are also associated with process quality. That is, higher ECERS scores are more likely in programs with lower child-teacher ratios.
What is the current quality of early education programs?
Although there are no nationally representative studies on the process quality of the average early childhood program, two multi-state studies and numerous smaller studies using the ECERS provide good estimates.
A 1998 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development study 15 of early care in nine states concluded that in early childhood settings for children through age three, 8% were rated "poor," 53% "fair," 30% "good," and 9% "excellent" in process quality.
The Cost, Quality, and Outcomes Study (1999) examined full-day child-care centers in four states and found the average quality as rated on the ECERS to be 4.26 (on the 1-7 scale). In this large-scale study of typical programs, only 24% had total average scores in the "good" to "excellent" range. (See Figure 1 for distribution of scores.)
Other studies using the ECERS to measure process quality confirm these findings. In 10 studies across multiple states, the average overall ECERS score did not reach 5.0. (See Figure 2) The Massachusetts Cost and Quality Study (2001), which described the quality of community-based programs serving preschool-aged children, and the FACES study of a nationally representative sample of Head Start programs, reported average scores of "almost good" (just below 5.0), but most were in the "minimally adequate" range. While these findings create concern about the quality of experiences provided to most young children in typical programs, the Massachusetts report and FACES study of Head Start offer hope that large-scale programs can achieve good quality.
Critical for Children
Children are respected, nurtured, and challenged. They enjoy close, warm relationships with the adults and other children in their classroom. They frequently interact and communicate with peers and adults; they do not spend long periods of time waiting, being ignored, or isolated. Children enjoy and look forward to school.
Children have ongoing opportunities to learn important skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Classrooms are busy with conversations, projects, experiments, reading and building activities. The materials and activities are individualized and challenge children's intellectual development. Children do not wander aimlessly and they are not expected to sit quietly for long periods of time.
Children are able to make meaningful decisions throughout the day. They can choose from a variety of activities, decide what type of products they want to create, engage in important conversations with friends and exercise their curiosity.
The children's home language and culture are respected, appreciated, and incorporated into the curriculum and the classroom.
Children participate in individual, small-group, and large-group activities. They learn important social and self-regulation skills through adult guidance and appropriate discipline. All children are not expected to develop at the same rate; individual needs and abilities are accommodated in all learning activities.
Children learn the skills necessary for future academic success. Language and literacy activities include frequent interactive book reading, expanded conversations with adults, opportunities to read and write throughout the day and a positive, joyful climate for learning. They have opportunities to learn the language of school — how to listen, follow directions, respond to teacher questions and initiate problem solving.
Children have the opportunity to learn basic school readiness skills. They learn expanded vocabulary, alphabetic principles, phonological awareness; concepts of numbers, shapes, measurement and spatial relations; task persistence; early scientific thinking; and information about the world and how it works.
Children's natural curiosity is used as a powerful motivator. Their interest in everything in their environment as well as ideas and concepts contribute to the design of activities and curriculum.
Children are given variety in their daily schedule. A child's day should allow for active and quiet time, indoor and outdoor time, short activities and longer ones to increase attention spans, and careful planning to address all aspects of development for all children.
Critical for Families
Family members are included as partners in all aspects of the educational program. Families are routinely consulted about the interests, abilities, and preferences of their children.
Family members are welcomed into the program and allowed to observe and participate in the activities.
Parents have opportunities to improve their educational and/or parenting skills.
Information about each child's progress is routinely shared with parents.
Parents have opportunities to contribute to the policies and program of the preschool. They also actively contribute to the educational goals of their children.
The family's home culture and language are respected, appreciated, and incorporated into all communications. The program understands the values, beliefs and customs of the families in order to design meaningful curricula.
All families are viewed as having strengths. The strong bond of care between parents and children is supported.
Critical for Teachers, Curriculum, and Classrooms
Teachers have, at a minimum, a four-year college degree and specific training in early childhood education. They have a deep understanding of child development, teaching methods, and curriculum, allowing them to skillfully promote children's social and cognitive development.
Teachers have frequent, meaningful interactions with children. They frequently engage children in meaningful conversation, expand their knowledge and vocabulary, use open-ended questioning, and encourage problem-solving skills.
Teachers teach important concepts such as mathematics and early literacy through projects, everyday experiences, collaborative activities, and active curriculum.
Teachers regularly assess each child's progress and make adjustments as necessary. They carefully document the emerging abilities of each child and plan activities that promote increased achievement. They also collaborate with other staff and parents about the meaning of the assessments.
Teachers refer children who may have special learning needs for comprehensive evaluation and diagnosis.
Teachers are paid a professional salary with benefits. All staff are compensated according to their professional preparation, experience, and specialized skills. Career advancement opportunities are available.
Teachers and other staff are provided with ongoing professional development. There is active supervision, mentoring and feedback for all staff. There is a climate of trust, respect and cooperation among all the employees.
Teachers communicate respect for the families and warmth for the children. They are knowledgeable about the languages and cultures of the children and families.
Teachers are able to have respectful, collaborative relationships with other staff, parents, and other professionals. Each classroom has at least one teacher and a second adult who work as a team throughout the day. Standards should reflect, at a minimum, the recommended ratios from the National Association of Education for Young Children for program accreditation. (One staff member to 10 children and group size of no more than 20 for children ages 3-5.)
Teachers use a curriculum with specified goals, approach toward learning, expected outcomes and assessment procedures. Teachers should be able to describe their curriculum, why it was chosen and what they are accomplishing with it.
Children have opportunities to learn in spacious, well-equipped classrooms that have a variety of age-appropriate materials including art, music, science, language, mathematics, puzzles, dramatic play and building materials.
Before setting policy, it's important to review what research into early education has documented. We know:
- The quality of early education and care significantly influences academic and social development.
- Children who are at risk for school failure are more strongly influenced by the quality of preschool.
- The average quality of care is less than good.
- Many vulnerable children attend the lowest quality programs.
- Many children from middle-class families also attend preschool programs of mediocre quality.
Taken together, these findings should lead policy makers to a sense of urgency about the need to improve the quality of preschool education in the United States. Since preschool program quality includes both structural and process features, they must be addressed together to achieve quality improvements. Accordingly, the regulations governing child-care licensing, as well as the educational requirements for preschool programs, are included in these policy recommendations.
Develop state standards that address preschool teacher qualifications, group size, and class ratios, in addition to the process features of programs such as teacher-child interactions, learning opportunities, assessment procedures, daily routines, materials, classroom environment, and health and safety routines. One route to higher quality is to support national (National Association for the Education of Young Children) or state accreditation for all preschool programs.
Raise teacher salaries and benefits to the levels of comparably qualified K-12 teachers.
Develop valid measures of early educational quality that incorporate the recent research on early literacy, mathematical, scientific and social-emotional learning.
Provide continuous training and quality improvement efforts to all preschool teachers and programs.
Work together at federal, state, and local levels of government to establish a coordinated system of high-quality education and care for all 3- and 4-year-olds.
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Barnett,W. S., Tarr, J.E., Lamy, C. and Frede, E. C. (2001) "Fragile Lives, Shattered Dreams: A Report on Implementation of Preschool Education in New Jersey's Abbott Districts" [Online]. Available: http/www.nieer.org/docs/index.php.Doc10=16.
Carolina Abecedarian Project. (1999). Early Learning, Later Success: The Abecedarian Study. Executive Summary [Online]. Available: http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~abc/.
Cassidy, D., Buell, M., Pugh-Hoese, S., & Russell, S. (1995). Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 171 - 183.
Cryer, D. "Defining and Assessing Early Childhood Program Quality," The Silent Crisis in U.S. Child Care [Special issue], Suzanne Helburn (Ed.), (1999). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 563, 39-55.
Cryer, D., Tietze,W., Burchinal, M., Leal, T. and Palacios, J. (1999). "Predicting Process Quality from Structural Quality in Preschool Programs: A Cross-Country Comparison," Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14 (3) 339-361.
Cryer, D. & Phillipson, L.. (1997). "Quality Details: A Close-Up Look at Child Care Program Strengths and Weaknesses," Young Children, 52 (5): 51-61. de Kruif, R.,McWilliam, R., Ridley, S.,Wakely,M. (2000). Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15 (2), 247 - 268.
de Kruif, R.,McWilliam, R., Ridley, S.,Wakely,M. (2000). "Classification of Teacher' Interaction Behaviors in Early Childhood Classrooms," Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15 (2), 247 - 268
Dickinson, D.K., & Smith, M.W. (1994). "Long-Term Effects of Preschool Teachers' Book Readings on Low-Income Children's Vocabulary and Story Comprehension," Reading Research Quarterly, 29 (2), 104-122. EJ 487 825.
Dunn, L. (1993). "Proximal and Distal Features of Day Care Quality and Children's Development," Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8 (2), 167-193. Epstein, A.S. (1993). Training for Quality: Improving Early Childhood Programs Through Systematic In-service Training. (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 9). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press. PS 022 104.
Frede, E. (1995). "The Role of Program Quality in Producing Early Childhood Program Benefits," Future of Children, 5(3), 115-132. EJ 523 966. Fuerst, J.S. and Fuerst, D. (1993). "Chicago Experience with an Early Childhood Program: The Special Case of the Child Parent Center Program," Urban Education, 28 (1, Apr): 69-96. EJ 463 446.
Galinsky, E., Howes, C., Kontos, S., & Shinn, M. B. (1994). "The Study of Children in Family Child Care and Relative Care: Key Findings and Policy Recommendations," Young Children, 50 (1), 58-61. EJ 493 657.
Kontos, S. & Wilcox-Herzog, A. (1997). "Teachers' Interactions with Children:Why Are They So Important?" Young Children, 52 (2), 4-12. EJ 538 100. Love, J. M. (1997). "Quality in Child Care Centers," Early Childhood Research and Policy Briefs, 1 (1). ED 417 827.
Love, J. M., Schochet, P. Z., & Meckstroth, A. L. (1996). Are They in Any Real Danger? What Research Does — and Doesn't — Tell Us about Child Care Quality and Children's Well-Being. Plainsboro, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. ED 415 030.
Marcon, R.A. (1992). "Differential Effects of Three Preschool Models on Inner-City 4-year-olds," Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7 (4), 517-530. EJ 458 104.
Neuman, S. B. (1996). Evaluation of the Books Aloud Project: An Executive Summary. Report to the William Penn Foundation from BooksAloud! Philadelphia, PA: Temple University [Online]. Available: www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/early_child_care.htm.
Phillips, D. A., McCartney, K., & Scarr, S. (1987). "Child Care Quality and Children's Social Development," Developmental Psychology, 23 (4), 537-543. EJ 361 532.
Pianta, R. C., & McCoy, S. J. (1997). "The First Day of School: The Predictive Validity of Early School Screening," Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18 (1), 1-22.
Purcell-Gates, V. (1996). "Stories, Coupons, and the 'TV Guide': Relationships Between Home Literacy Experiences and Emergent Literacy Knowledge," Reading Research Quarterly, 31 (4), 406-428. EJ 532 191.
Purcell-Gates, V., & Dahl, K. L. (1991). "Low-SES Children's Success and Failure at Early Literacy Learning in Skills-Based Classrooms," Journal of Reading Behavior, 23 (1), 1-34. EJ 437 304.
Resnick, G. & Zill, N. (1999). "Is Head Start Providing High Quality Educational Services?" Unpacking Classroom Processes. Presentation at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Alburquerque, NM [Online]. Availabe: www2.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/hsb/hsreac/faces/quality2.pdf
Reynolds A.J., Temple, J.A., Robertson, D.L., & Mann E.A. (2001). "Long-Term Effects of an Early Childhood Intervention on Educational Achievement and Juvenile Arrest: A 15-year Follow-up of Low-Income Children in Public Schools," JAMA, May 9, 285 (18):2339-46.
Reynolds, A.J., & Temple, J.A. (1998). "Extended Early Childhood Intervention and School Achievement: Age Thirteen Findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study," Child Development, 69 (1):231-46.
Roberts, J., Rabinowitz, S., Bryant, D. M., Burchinal, M., Koch, M., & Ramey, C. T. (1989). "Language Skills of Children with Different Preschool Experiences," Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32 (4), 773-786. EJ 405 212. "The Silent Crisis in U.S. Child Care" [Special issue.] Suzanne W. Helburn (Ed.). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 563, 73-97.
Scarr, S., Eisenberg, M., and Deata-Deckard, K. (1994)."Measurements of Quality in Childcare Centers," Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 131-151.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Research Council. [Online]. Available: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/prdyc/ch5.html.
Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milburn, S. (1995). "Effects of Differential Instructional Approaches on Young Children's Achievement and Motivation," Child Development, 66(1), 209-223. EJ 501 879.
Wasik, B. H., Ramey, C. T., Bryant, D. M., & Sparling, J. J. (1990). "A Longitudinal Study of Two Early Intervention Strategies: Project CARE," Child Development, 61(6), 1682-1696. EJ 426 160.
Whitebook, M., Howes, C., & Phillips, D. (1989). Who Cares? Child Care Teachers and the Quality of Care in America: Final Report. National Child Care Staffing Study. Berkeley, CA: Child Care Employee Project. ED 323 031.
Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., & Angell, A. L. (1994). "A Picture Book Reading Intervention in Day Care and Home for Children from Low-Income Families," Developmental Psychology, 30 (5), 679-689. EJ 493 520.
Click the "Endnotes" link above to hide these endnotes.
For a fuller discussion of recent quality studies, see: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (NICHD). (2000). "Characteristics and Quality of Child Care for Toddlers and Preschoolers," Applied Developmental Science, 4 (3): 116-135;
Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., Burchinal, M.R., Clifford, R.M., Culkin, M.L., Howes, C., Kagan, S.L., Yazejian, N., Byler, P., Rustici, J., & Zelazo, J. (1999).
The Children of the Cost, Quality, and Outcomes Study Go to School. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center; Scarr, S., Eisenberg, M. and Deater-Deckard, K. (1994)."Measurement of Quality in Child Care Centers," Early Childhood Research Quarterly, (9), 131-151.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Characteristics and quality of child care for toddlers and preschoolers. Applied Developmental Science, 4 (3), 116-135. Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., et al. (1999).
Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., et al. (1999). Scarr, S., Eisenberg, M. and Deater-Deckard, K. (1994) Measurement of quality in child care centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 131-151.
Barnett,W.S. (1995). "Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes," Future of Children, 5 (3), 25-50. EJ523 962; Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., and Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant Benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study Through Age 27. (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 10). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press. ED 366 433.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). National Household Education Survey, 1999, Parent Interviews.
Harms, T. and Clifford, R.M. (1980). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.
Harms, T., Clifford, R.M., and Cryer, D. (1998). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. Revised Edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., et al (1999).
Peisner-Feinberg, E. & Burchinal, M. (1997). "Relations Between Preschool Children's Child Care Experiences and Concurrent Development," The Cost, Quality, and Outcomes Study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43 (3), 451-477.
Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., Burchinal, M., et al, p.2.
Vandell, D. and Wolf, B. (2002). Child Care Quality: Does It Matter and Does It Need to Be Improved? Madison, WI; Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Madison-Wisconsin. Available at https://aspe.hhs.gov.ccquality00/ccqual.htm.
Howes, C., Phillips, D., and Whitebook, M. (1992). "Thresholds of Quality: Implications for the Social Development of Children in Center-Based Child Care," Child Development, 63, 449-460.
Howes et al.1992.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (NICHD). (1998). The NICHD Study of Early Child Care [Online]. Available: http: //www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/early_child_care.htm.
Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., et al (1999).
Marshall, N., Creps, C., Burstein, N., Glantz, F.B., Robeson,W.W., & Barnett,W. S. (2001). The Cost and Quality of Full Day, Year-Round Early Care and Education in Massachusetts: Preschool Classrooms.Wellesley Centers for Women and Abt Associates Inc.
Head Start FACES: Longitudinal Findings on Program Performance, Third Progress Report. (January 2001). Commissioner's Office of Research and Evaluation and the Head Start Bureau. Administration on Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Bowman, B., Donovan, S.M., & Burns, S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to Learn: Educating Our Preschoolers.Washington, DC: National Research Council [Online]. Available: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/.
Bredekamp, S. & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs, revised edition.Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.