The Impact of Family Involvement
Studies of individual families show that what the family does is more important to student success than family income or education. This is true whether the family is rich or poor, whether the parents finished high school or not, or whether the child is in preschool or in the upper grades (Coleman 1966;Epstein 1991a; Stevenson & Baker 1987; de Kanter, Ginsburg, & Milne 1986; Henderson & Berla 1994; Keith & Keith 1993; Liontos 1992; Walberg, n.d.)
The single most important activity for building the knowledge required for eventual success in reading is reading aloud to children (Anderson et al. 1985).
International comparisons show the high academic success of students from Asian countries, which many attribute to the priority their families give to education (Stevenson 1993).
If every parent of a child aged 1 through 9 spent one hour reading or working on schoolwork with his or her child five days a week, American parents would annually devote at least 8.7 billion hours to support their children's reading (U.S. Department of Education 1994a).
In money terms, if the children's teachers spent the same time one-on-one, the cost to American taxpayers would be approximately $230 billion more in 1991 about the same as what the American public pays yearly for the entire K-12 public American education enterprise. In practice, however, only half of parents with children under age 9 say they read to them every day (Gorman 1993).
Family involvement is one of the best long-term investments a family can make.
The difference in lifetime earning between a student who did not graduate from high school and one who did is over $200,000. The difference for a student who received a bachelor's degree or more is almost $1 million (The U.S. Census Bureau 1994).
- Forty percent of parents across the country believe that they are not devoting enough time to their children's education (Finney 1993).
- Teachers ranked strengthening parents' roles in their children's learning as the issue that should receive the highest priority in public education policy over the next few years (Louis Harris and Associates 1993).
- Among students aged 10 to 13, 72 percent said they would like to talk to their parents more about schoolwork. Forty-eight percent of older adolescents (14-17 years old) agreed (National Commission on Children 1991).
- Eighty-nine percent of company executives identified the biggest obstacle to school reform as lack of parental involvement (Perry 1993).
But if family involvement is so important, why isn't more of it happening? Aspects of modern life stand in the way.
With the rise in two-breadwinner families, one-parent families, and the need for family members to hold more than one job, families have many demands on their time. 66 percent of employed parents with children under 18 say they do not have enough time for their children (Families and Work Institute 1994).
For example, many children are left at home alone, unsupervised or watching television for hours a day. Working parents are often faced with trying to complete all household duties in the limited time available. Teachers also are strapped for time. Although some would like to make home visits to families or talk more with students' parents, many teachers are parents themselves and have families to attend to.
Uncertainty about what to do and their own importance
Many parents today are unsure how to help their children learn (National Commission on Children 1991). Some are simply not prepared to be parents. The number of teenage parents has risen dramatically in recent years (Snyder & Fromboluti 1993). Other parents may have had bad experiences with school themselves and are reluctant to return to school even as a parent, or they may feel intimidated and unsure about the value of their contributions compared with those of a teacher.
Yet many parents say they would be willing to spend more time on homework or other learning activities with their children if teachers gave them more guidance (Epstein 1987; Henderson, Marburger, & Ooms 1986).
But teachers also need guidance. Although teacher certification requirements in about half the states mention the importance of working with families, very few states require extensive coursework or in-service training in working with families ( Radcliffe, Malone, & Nathan 1994). Few teacher preparation programs address techniques for communicating with families, and many teachers and other school staff may simply not know how to go about involving parents more in their children's learning.
The families of the children being educated in America's schools today are extremely diverse. Many immigrant families do not speak or understand English. This language barrier may be a special problem for low-income families who have little or no education themselves. The 1980s saw the number of poor Hispanic and Asian immigrant children increase dramatically ( Morra 1994).
Families also have different views on schools, teaching, and their own role in their children's education. Teachers may be unable to communicate with non-English-speaking parents. Even those family members who speak English but have little education often have difficulty in communicating with schools because their life experiences and perspectives are so different (Comer 1988; Moles 1993).
Lack of a supportive environment
Nurturing families has not been a priority on the American agenda. More and more parents face the difficult task of raising their children alone. More children than at any time since 1965 live in poverty (Children's Defense Fund 1994).
Low-income parents have less contact with schools than do their better-off counterparts (Moles 1993). They need support from all sectors of the community if they are to become more involved in their children's education.
Schools need to establish clear school and district policies on family involvement and reach out to all parents on a continuing basis, providing personal contact, literature and classes on parenting, literacy training, and parental resource centers.
Religious and civic organizations need to encourage parents as they guide the growth of their children. Communities also must work with families to make the streets safe for children and provide constructive after-school and summer experiences.
Employers need to be supportive of their employees who are parents, allowing more flexibility in work schedules as well as more options for part-time employment.
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Anderson, R. C., Heibert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). BECOMING A NATION OF READERS: THE REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON READING. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
Andrus, Cecil D, Governor of Idaho. (1994). Personal correspondence.
Barton, P.E., & Coley, R.J. (1992). AMERICA'S SMALLEST SCHOOL: THE FAMILY. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bastian, L. & Taylor, B. (1991). SCHOOL CRIME: A NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY REPORT. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Bauch, J. P. (1993). A SAMPLER OF PROJECTS AND RESULTS -- THE TRANSPARENT SCHOOL MODEL 1987-1993. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Betty Phillips Center for Parenthood Education.
Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), CHILD DEVELOPMENT TODAY AND TOMORROW. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Becher, R. (1984). PARENT INVOLVEMENT: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH AND PRINCIPLES OF SUCCESSFUL PRACTICE. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Bempechat, J. (1992). The role of parent involvement in children's academic achievement. SCHOOL COMMUNITY JOURNAL, 2(2), 31-4.
Berla, N., Henderson, A., & Kerewsky, W. (1989). THE MIDDLE SCHOOL YEARS: A PARENT'S HANDBOOK. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Berrueta-Clement, J. R., Schweinhart, L., Barnett, W., Epstein, W., and Weikart, D. (1984). CHANGED LIVES: THE EFFECTS OF THE PERRY PRESCHOOL PROGRAM ON YOUTHS THROUGH AGE 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). A REPORT ON LONGITUDINAL EVALUATIONS OF PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS, VOL. II: IS EARLY INTERVENTION EFFECTIVE? Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Office of Child Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 093 501).
Caplan, N., Choy, M. H., & Whitmore, J. K. (1992). Indochinese refugee families and academic achievement. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 266(2).
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1994). A MATTER OF TIME: RISK AND OPPORTUNITY IN THE NONSCHOOL HOURS. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Chapin Hall Center for Children. (1992). COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR STUDENTS: A NEW LOOK AT THEIR ROLE AND IMPORTANCE AND A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THEIR DISTRIBUTION ACROSS COMMUNITIES. Chicago: Author.
Children's Aid Society. (n.d.). THE WASHINGTON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PROJECT. PROGRESS REPORT, OCTOBER 1992 TO JUNE 1993. New York: Author.
Children's Defense Fund. (1994). THE STATE OF AMERICA'S CHILDREN: YEARBOOK 1994. Washington, DC: Author.
Chimerine, C. B., Panton, K. L. M., & Russo, A. W. W. (1993). THE OTHER 91 PERCENT: STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF OUT-OF-SCHOOL EXPERIENCES OF CHAPTER 1 STUDENTS. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
Choy, S. P., Henke, R. R., Alt, M. N., Hedrich, E. A., & Bobbitt, S. A. SCHOOLS AND STAFFING IN THE UNITED STATES: A STATISTICAL PROFILE, 1990-91. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Clark, R. M. (1988). Parents as providers of linguistic and social capital. EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS, 66(2), 93-95.
Clark, R. M. (1990). Why disadvantaged students succeed. PUBLIC WELFARE, pp. 17-23. Spring.
Clinton, W. J. (1994). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Expanding family-friendly work arrangements in the executive branch. Washington, DC: The White House. July 11.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). EQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
College Board. (1994). COLLEGE-BOUND SENIORS OF 1994: INFORMATION ON STUDENTS WHO TOOK THE SAT AND ACHIEVEMENT TESTS OF THE COLLEGE BOARD. New York, NY: Author.
Comer, J. P. (1988). Educating poor minority children. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 259(5), 42-48.
Conference Board. (1994). Job sharing. WORK-FAMILY ROUNDTABLE, 4 (2).
Cooper, H. (1989). HOMEWORK. White Plains, NY: Longman.
D'Angelo, D. (1991). PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN CHAPTER 1: A REPORT TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL. Hampton, NH: RMC Research Corporation.
Dauber, S. L., & Epstein, J. L. (1993). Parents' attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), FAMILIES AND SCHOOLS IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY (pp. 53-72). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Davies, D. (1988). Benefits and barriers to parent involvement. COMMUNITY EDUCATION RESEARCH DIGEST, 2(2), 11-19.
Davies, D., Burch, P., & Johnson, V. (1991). A PORTRAIT OF SCHOOLSREACHING OUT: REPORT OF A SURVEY ON PRACTICES AND POLICIES OFFAMILY-COMMUNITY-SCHOOL COLLABORATION. Boston, MA: Institute forResponsive Education.
de Kanter, A., Ginsburg, A. L., & Milne, A. M. (1987). PARENT INVOLVEMENT STRATEGIES: A NEW EMPHASIS ON TRADITIONAL PARENT ROLES. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
DESIGNS FOR CHANGE. (1993). Issues in Restructuring Schools. Author, 5. Fall.
EDUCATION DAILY. (1994). NEA kicks off effort to get parents involved in school. Author. July 11.
Elkind, D. (1993). PARENTING YOUR TEENAGER IN THE '90s. Rosemont, NJ: Modern Learning Press.
Elam, S.M., Lowell, C.R., and Gallup, A.M. (1994),. The 26th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, September.
Entwisle, D. & Alexander, K. (1992). Summer setback: Race, proverty, school composition, a mathematics achievement in the first 2 years of school. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 57, 72-84.
Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parents' reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 86, 277-294.
Epstein, J. L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. EDUCATION AND URBAN SOCIETY, 19, 119-36. February.
Epstein, J. L. (1991a). Effects on student achievement of teacherpractices of parent involvement. In S. Silvern (Ed.), ADVANCES INREADING/LANGUAGE RESEARCH, VOL. 5. LITERACY THROUGH FAMILY, COMMUNITYAND SCHOOL INTERACTION. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Epstein, J. L. (1991b). Paths to partnership: What we can learn from federal, state, district, and school initiatives. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 72 (5), 344-349. January.
Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (1992). MANUAL FOR TEACHERS: TEACHERS INVOLVE PARENTS IN SCHOOLWORK (TIPS) MATH AND SCIENCE INTERACTIVE HOMEWORK IN THE ELEMENTARY GRADES. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning.
ERIC. (1990). Guidelines for family television viewing. ERIC DIGEST. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
Families and Work Institute. (1994). EMPLOYERS, FAMILIES, AND EDUCATION: FACILITATING FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN LEARNING. New York: Author.
Family Service America. (n.d.). FAMILIES TOGETHER WITH SCHOOLS. Milwaukee, WI: Author.
Fathernet information available from: Children, Youth, and Family Consortium, 12 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108, or via e-mail at [email protected]
Finney, P. (1993). The PTA/Newsweek national education survey. NEWSWEEK. May 17.
Freedman, M. (1994). SENIORS IN NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE: A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE COMMONWEALTH FUND'S AMERICANS OVER 55 AT WORK PROGRAM. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Fruchter, N., Galletta, A., & White, J. L. (1992). NEW DIRECTIONS IN PARENT INVOLVEMENT. New York: Academy for Educational Development. (a href="ed360683.html">ERIC Abstract)
Furano, K., Roaf, P. A., Styles, M. B., & Branch, A. Y. (1993). BIG BROTHERS/BIG SISTERS: A STUDY OF PROGRAM PRACTICES. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Ferguson, S., Outreach coordinator for the National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. (1994). Personal correspondence.
Goodson, B. D., Swartz, J. P., & Millsap, M. A. (1991). WORKING WITH FAMILIES: PROMISING PROGRAMS TO HELP PARENTS SUPPORT YOUNG CHILDREN'S LEARNING. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Gorman, T. (1993). Parents help with reading -- but quit too soon. AMERICAN TEACHER. February.
Gotts, E. E. (1982). SCHOOL-FAMILY RELATIONS PROGRAM. Final (annual) report. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
Hanson, S. L., & Ginsburg, A. (1985). Gaining ground: Values and high school success. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education.
Henderson, A. (1987). THE EVIDENCE CONTINUES TO GROW: PARENT INVOLVEMENT IMPROVES STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (1994). A NEW GENERATION OF EVIDENCE: THE FAMILY IS CRITICAL TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Henderson, A. T., Marburger, C. L., & Ooms, T. (1986). BEYOND THE BAKE SALE: AN EDUCATOR'S GUIDE TO WORKING WITH PARENTS. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Heyns, B (1988). Summer programs and compensatory education: The future of an idea. In B. I. Williams, P.A. Richmond, & B.J. Mason, (eds.), DESIGNS FOR COMPENSATORY EDUCATION: CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS AND PAPERS. Washington, DC: Research and Evaluation Associates.
Hill, Alan T., President of the Corporation for Educational Technology. (1994). Personal correspondence. Hughes, E., Administrator for Education Support Services, McAllen Independent School District. (1994). Personal Correspondence.
Ingrassia, M. (1993). Growing up fast and frightened. NEWSWEEK, November 22.
Johnson, V. (1993). Parent centers send clear message: Come be a partner in educating your children. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT. (September, No. 4). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning.
Kagan, S. L., & Neville, P. (1993). INTEGRATING SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: UNDERSTANDING THE PAST TO SHAPE THE FUTURE. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Keith, T. Z., & Keith, P. B. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 22(3), 474-496.
Lee, V. E., & Croninger, R. G. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 102 (3), 286-329.
Leler, H. (1983). Parent education and involvement in relation to the schools and to parents of school-aged children. In R. Haskins & D. Adams (Eds.), PARENT EDUCATION AND PUBLIC POLICY. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Levin, H. M. (1989) ACCELERATED SCHOOLS AFTER THREE YEARS. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for Educational Research.
Lewis, A. (1994). Director of Programs, National Urban League. Personal coorespondence.
Liontos, L. B. (1992). AT-RISK FAMILIES AND SCHOOLS BECOMING PARTNERS. Eugene: University of Oregon, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
Louis Harris and Associates. (1987). THE METROPOLITAN LIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER: STRENGTHENING LINKS BETWEEN HOME AND SCHOOL. New York: Author.
Louis Harris and Associates. (1993). METROPOLITAN LIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER 1993: VIOLENCE IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. New York: Author.
Lueder, D. C. (1989). Tennessee parents were invited to participate -- and they did. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 47(2), 15-17.
Maine Meeting Place information available from the Maine Meeting Place Project, c/o York County Parent Awareness, Inc., 150 Main St., Midtown Mall, Sanford, ME 04073, or via e-mail at: [email protected]
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (1989). MASS MUTUAL FAMILY VALUES STUDY. Spingfield, MA; Author.
McLaughlin, M. (1994). URBAN SANCTUARIES. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Melaville, A. I., & Blank, M. J. (1993). TOGETHER WE CAN: A GUIDE FOR CRAFTING A PRO-FAMILY SYSTEM OF EDUCTION AND HUMAN SERVICES. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Informational brochure on the Parent Leadership Program. National Headquarters, 634 South Spring, 11th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90014.
Michael, B. (1990). VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Moles, O. C. (1993). Collaboration between schools and disadvantaged parents: Obstacles and openings. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), FAMILIES AND SCHOOLS IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Morra, L. G. (1994). School-age children: Poverty and diversity challenge schools nationwide. Testimony before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources and the Subcommittee on Education, Arts, and Humanities, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office. March 16, 1994.
Mullis, I.V.S., Campbell, J.R., Farstrup, A.E. (1993). NAEP 1992 READING REPORT CARD FOR THE NATION AND STATES. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Mullis, I.V. S., Dossey, J. A., Campbell, J. R., Gentile, C. A., O'Sullivan, C., Latham, A.S. (1994). NAEP 1992 TRENDS IN ACADEMIC PROGRESS. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Murray, J., & Connberg, B. (1992). CHILDREN AND TELEVISION: A PRIMER FOR PARENTS. Boys Town, NE: Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.
National Commission on Children.(1991). SPEAKING OF KIDS: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF CHILDREN AND PARENTS. Washington, DC: Author.
National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (1994). PRISONERS OF TIME. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Education Goals Panel. (1993). THE NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS REPORT: BUILDING A NATION OF LEARNERS. Washington, DC: U.S. Governement Printing Office.
National Parent Information Network (NPIN)information available from: Lilian G. Katz, ERIC/EECE, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, 805 W. Pennsylvania Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801-4897, 1-800-583-4135.
National Research Council. (1993). UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING VIOLENCE. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Urban League. (n.d.). PARTNERS FOR REFORM IN SCIENCE AND MATH (PRISM). New York: Author.
Nicolau, S., & Ramos, C. L. (1990). TOGETHER IS BETTER: BUILDING STRONG RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SCHOOLS AND HISPANIC PARENTS. New York: Hispanic Policy Development Project.
Pelavin, S.H., & Kane, M.B. (1990). CHANGING THE ODDS: FACTORS INCREASING ACCESS TO COLLEGE. New York: College Entrance Board.
Pelavin Associates, Inc. (1993). EQUITY 2000 NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. Washington, DC: Author.
Perez-Ortega, L. (1994). PARENT LEADERSHIP PROGRAM. Los Angeles: Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Perry, N. (1993). School reform: Big pain, little gain. FORTUNE, 128, November 29 , 130-138.
Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc. (1994). Internal AFT Survey of elementary and secondary school teachers' views on school reform. April.
Pfannensteil, J., Lambson, T., & Yarnell, V. (1991). SECOND WAVE STUDY OF THE PARENTS AS TEACHERS PROGRAM. St. Louis: Parents as Teachers National Center.
Powledge, T. (1994). Information highway without tollbooths: Maryland is the first state to offer free access to the Internet. WASHINGTON POST, June 23.
Puma, M. J., Jones, C. C., Rock, D., & Fernandez, R. (1993). PROSPECTS: THE CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED STUDY OF EDUCATIONAL GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY. INTERIM REPORT. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
Radcliffe, B., Malone, M., & Nathan, J. (1994). TRAINING FOR PARENT PARTNERSHIP: MUCH MORE SHOULD BE DONE. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Center for School Change.
Radin, N. (1969). The impact of a kindergarten home counseling program. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 3, 18-26.
Radin, N. (1972). Three degrees of maternal involvement in a preschool program: Impact on mothers and children. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 4, 1355-1364.
Rich, D. (1988). MEGASKILLS: HOW FAMILIES CAN HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED IN SCHOOL AND BEYOND. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rioux, J. W., & Berla, N. (1993). INNOVATIONS IN PARENT AND FAMILY INVOLVEMENT. Princeton Junction, NJ: Eye on Education.
Ripley, S. (1993). A PARENT'S GUIDE: ACCESSING PARENT GROUPS. Washington, DC: National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities.
Rutherford, B., Billig, S. H., & Kettering, J. F. (in press). Evaluating education reform: Parent and community involvement in the middle grades. Literature review. In B. Rutherford (Ed.), SCHOOL/FAMILY PARTNERSHIPS. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Salganik, M. W. (1994). Making connections between families and schools. R&D PREVIEW, 9 (3), 2-3.
Scott, R., & Davis, A. (1979). PRESCHOOL EDUCATION AND BUSING: DO WE HAVE OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT? Paper presented at the meeting of the National Urban Education Association. November.
Scott-Jones, D. (1984). Family influences on cognitive development and school achievement. REVIEW OF EDUCATION RESEARCH, 11, 259-304.
Shartrand, A., Kreider, H., & Erickson-Warfield, M. (in press). PREPARING TEACHERS TO INVOLVE PARENTS: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
Singer, J. L., Singer, D.G., Desmond, R., Hirsch, B., Nichol, A. (1988). Family mediation and children's cognition, aggression and comprehension of television: A longitudinal study. JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 9, 347.
Snyder, T. D., & Fromboluti, C. S. (1993). YOUTH INDICATORS 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Solomon, Z. P. (1991). California's policy on parent involvement: State leadership for local initiatives. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 72(5), 359-362.
Sopris West. (1993). EDUCATION PROGRAMS THAT WORK. 19th edition. Longmont, CO: Author.
St. Pierre, R., Swartz, J., Gamse, B., Murray, S., Deck, D., & Nickel, P. (1994). NATIONAL EVALUATION OF THE EVEN START FAMILY LITERACY PROGRAM. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Stevenson, D. L. & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child's school performance. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 58, 1348-1357.
Stevenson, H. (1993). EXTRACURRICULAR PROGRAMS IN EAST ASIAN SCHOOLS. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: MARCH 1993 AND 1992. Current population reports, P20-476. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education. (1987). WHAT WORKS: RESEARCH ABOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). GROWING UP DRUG FREE: A PARENT'S GUIDE TO PREVENTION. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993a). REACHING THE GOALS: GOAL 6. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993b). SUMMER CHALLENGE: MODEL SUMMER PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994a). Calculations based on information from the 1994 Condition of Education, the 1993 Digest of Education Statistics, and the 1993 Statistical Abstract of the United States.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994b). Personal conversation with teachers in the shadow teacher program at the U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
University of Michigan. (1994). MONITORING THE FUTURE. Ann Arbor, MI: Author, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.
Utah Center for Families in Education. (n.d.). FAMILY EDUCATION PLAN TRAINING: UTAH NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. Salt Lake City: Author.
Walberg, H. J. (1984). Families as partners in educational productivity. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 65, 397-400.
Walberg, H. J. (n.d.). Family programs for academic learning. Prepared for the Office of the Under Secretary, U.S. Department of Education.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 63, 3.
White, B. L. (1987). Education begins at birth. PRINCIPAL, 66 (5).
White, B. L. (1988). EDUCATING THE INFANT AND TODDLER. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
White, V. (1994). Unpublished material from survey of state legislative activities on parental involvement. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.
Wilson, J.Q. (1994). What to do about crime. COMMENTARY. 98 (3), 25-34.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (1994). FAMILY-COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SCHOOLS. Madison: Author.