For Other Professionals
Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction: An Instructional Framework
CORI is an approach to reading instruction that helps children learn about scientific subjects while exploring non-fiction books. Read about the steps involved in using this approach to instruction.
Based on research in motivation, cognition, and instruction in reading, as well as our experience in teaching, we expected that an instructional framework that enhanced students' long-term literacy activity would have to address student needs for the following:
- Observing and personalizing "real-world" problems as a basis for intrinsic motivations for reading
- Learning a variety of cognitive strategies for exploring these problems
- Interacting socially to construct conceptual knowledge
- Communicating their understanding to genuine audiences
Consequently, our framework, which we termed Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI), consisted of five instructional dimensions, descriptions of which follow.
Observing and personalizing
To create a context for the motivations of curiosity, aesthetic involvement, challenge, and self-efficacy in reading, we attempted to enable students to observe and think about the concrete objects and events in the "real world" around them. Student choice in selecting the subtopics, goals, and materials for learning was emphasized. We expected that sustained work on a conceptual issue of personal interest would enable students to augment their conceptual knowledge as they learned increasingly complex reading strategies (Pintrich & Schrauben, 1992).
The main point of the observing and personalizing phase of instruction was to support students in developing and expressing their personal interests in the world around them. This phase also included bringing background experience and knowledge into the learning and exploration processes. We encouraged students to select a subject important to them and to identify topics (such as moon craters) to which they wanted to devote time and energy in their learning.
Searching and retrieving
Students were taught how to search for subtopics related to their general interests, how to search for informative resources, such as books, and how to find opportunities for further real-world observation, all of which could extend their knowledge and satisfy their curiosities. Students chose their own science trade books to use in learning about the subtopics they selected. We expected that as students acquired concepts according to their choices, they would be motivated to form increasingly higher order abstractions and generalizations about the themes they were studying.
This instructional dimension emphasized the cognitive strategies students needed to pursue and satisfy their explicitly stated topical interests. We began by teaching students to search and select resources. Forming an overview of resources such as books, globes, or sites for field observations was important, as was understanding the organization of a classroom library, an expository trade book, and the pages of an illustrated reference work, and being able to skim and scrutinize texts, graphs, charts, maps, tables, and schedules.
Comprehending and integrating
The comprehending and integrating portion of the instructional framework encompassed the following comprehension strategies: (a) determining the topic of a text selection; (b) detecting critical details; (c) summarizing the text; (d) making comparisons between texts; (e) developing criteria for evaluating a book; and (f) critically reflecting on the author's point of view and presentation of information.
To create an inclusive base for students' literacy development, we incorporated the objective of connecting literary experience to conceptual understanding. We wanted students to be able to identify plot, character, setting, and theme in narrative and literary works such as novels and folktales. We also wanted to enable students to respond aesthetically to literature through considering other points of view.
Communicating to others
Many exciting educational programs contain high expectations for communication. Some programs emphasize writing (Hiebert & Fisher, 1990); whereas others emphasize construction of a tangible artifact such as a map or a diorama (Blumenfeld et al., 1991). High expectations for purposeful communication are likely to lead students to enjoy the processes of observation, inquiry, reading, writing, and problem solving with peers.
In our framework, presenting a coherent message in the form of a written report, a class-authored book, or a diorama were considered appropriate syntheses. Students were expected to identify important information, to organize that information into a coherent form, and to express their ideas precisely and convincingly. They were expected to develop critical stances toward texts by applying evaluation criteria to a variety of materials. The major aim of the communicating to others instructional dimension was to enable students to express their understandings about topics of personal interest in a variety of coherent, persuasive, and accurate communications to classmates or other audiences of their choosing.
Peer-peer interaction
We created a cycle of opportunities for social interaction. Evidence is accumulating that participating in a learning community sustains interest in learning, permits higher order integration of ideas, and fosters the internalization of social processes of constructing meaning (Almasi, 1993). However, some social communication structures are more likely than others to foster efficient, coherent, and complete thinking and learning (Johnson, Johnson, Stanne, & Garibaldi, 1990). We emphasized peer-led discussion in which the group had the common goal of understanding the concepts and the reading strategies that were the focal points of the lessons.
References
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Adoni, H., & Shadmi, E. (1980). The portrait of the citizen as a young reader: The functions of books in the political socialization of youth in Israel. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 121-137.
Almasi, J. F. (1993). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (l984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-293). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285-303.
Archambault, R. D. (Ed.) (1964). John Dewey on Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Au, K. H., & Mason, J. M. (1981). Social organizational factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(1), 115-152.
Beach, R., & Hynds, S. (1991). Research on response to literature. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 453-489). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting, and learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. In M. Lepper & D. Green (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation (pp. 205-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 264-274.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychology, 26, 325-346.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Fillion, B. (1981). Reading as inquiry: An approach to literature learning. English Journal, 1, 39-45.
Foertsch, M. A. (1992). Reading in and out of school: Factors influencing the literacy achievement of American students in grades 4, 8, and 12, in 1988 and 1990. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-33.
Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1992). Taking students seriously. In F. M. Newman (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gaskins, I., Guthrie, J. T., Satlow, E., Ostertag, F., Six, L., Byrne, J., & Conner, B. (in press). Integrating instruction of science and reading/writing processes: Goals, assessments, and teacher development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Glynn, S. M., Yeaney, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). A constructivist view of learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeaney, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gray, W. S., & Rogers, B. (1956). Maturity in reading: Its nature and appraisal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greaney, V., & Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisure-time reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 3-20.
Guthrie, J. T., & Greaney, V. (1991). Literacy acts. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 68-96). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Hutchinson, S. R. (1991). Relations of document literacy and prose literacy to occupational and societal characteristics of young black and white adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 30-48.
Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W., Wang, Y., & Afflerbach, P. (1993). Influences of instruction on amount of reading: An empirical exploration of social, cognitive, and instructional indicators. (Reading Research Report No. 3). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, Universities of Georgia and Maryland.
Hiebert, E. H., & Fisher, C. W. (1990, March). Whole language: Three themes for the future. Educational Leadership, pp. 62-64.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1989). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Stanne, M. B., & Garibaldi, J. (1990). Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130(4), 507-516.
LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. New York: Academic Press.
Mikulecky, L. (1987). The status of literacy in our society. Research in literacy: Merging perspectives, Thirty-sixth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 211-237). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Morrow, L. M. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature, and attitudes of children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 250-275.
Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
Paris, S., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in the classroom. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Schuder, T., Teachers in the Students Achieving Independent Learning Program, Bergman, J. L., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1992). A researcher/educator collaborative interview study of transactional comprehension strategies instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 231-246.
Reif, F., & Allen, S. (1992). Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, 9(1), 1-44.
Roehler, L. R. (1992). Embracing the instructional complexities of reading instruction. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school. New York: Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehension skills and self-efficacy with strategy value information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 285-302.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211-230
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402-433.
Stevenson, C., & Carr, J. F. (Eds.). (1993) Integrated studies in the middle grades. New York: Teachers College Press.
Wentzel, K. (1989). Adolescent classroom grades, standards for performance, and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 131-142.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
Adapted from: Guthrie, J. T., Bennett, L., McGough, K. (Winter, 1994). Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction: An Integrated Curriculum to Develop Motivations and Strategies for Reading. Reading Research Report No. 10. National Reading Research Center. University of Georgia and University of Maryland.
1 recommendations |
