Learning to Read and Write: Developmentally Appropriate Practices for Young Children
IRA and NAEYC believe that achieving high standards of literacy for every child in the United States is a shared responsibility of schools, early childhood programs, families, and communities. But teachers of young children, whether employed in preschools, child care programs, or elementary schools, have a unique responsibility to promote children's literacy development, based on the most current professional knowledge and research.
A review of research along with the collective wisdom and experience of members has led IRA and NAEYC to conclude that learning to read and write is a complex, multifaceted process that requires a wide variety of instructional approaches, a conclusion similar to that reached by an esteemed panel of experts for the National Academy of Sciences (Snow, Burns, & Griffin 1998).
Similarly, this review of research leads to a theoretical model of literacy learning and development as an interactive process. Research supports the view of the child as an active constructor of his or her own learning, while at the same time studies emphasize the critical role of the supportive, interested, engaged adult (e.g., teacher, parent, or tutor) who provides scaffolding for the child's development of greater skill and understanding (Mason & Sinha 1993; Riley 1996). The principle of learning is that "children are active learners, drawing on direct social and physical experience as well as culturally transmitted knowledge to construct their own understandings of the world around them" (Bredekamp & Copple 1997, 13).
IRA and NAEYC believe that goals and expectations for young children's achievement in reading and writing should be developmentally appropriate, that is, challenging but achievable, with sufficient adult support. A continuum of reading and writing development is generally accepted and useful for teachers in understanding the goals of literacy instruction and in assessing children's progress toward those goals. (Click here for an abbreviated continuum of reading and writing development; for more detailed examples, see Chall 1983; Education Department of Western Australia 1994a-d; Whitmore & Goodman 1995; Snow, Burns, & Griffin 1998). Good teachers understand that children do not progress along this developmental continuum in rigid sequence. Rather, each child exhibits a unique pattern and timing in acquiring skills and understanding related to reading and writing.
Like other complex skills, reading and writing are outcomes that result from the continual interplay of development and learning, and therefore a range of individual variation is to be expected in the rate and pace at which children gain literacy skills. Given exposure to appropriate literacy experiences and good teaching during early childhood, most children learn to read at age six or seven, a few learn at four, some learn at five, and others need intensive individualized support to learn to read at eight or nine. Some children who do not explore books and other print during their early years are likely to need more focused support for literacy development when they enter an educational program, whether at preschool, kindergarten, or first grade (since preschool and even kindergarten attendance is not universal). Other children who enter school speaking little or no English are likely to need instructional strategies in their home language (Snow, Burns, & Griffin 1998).
Given the range within which children typically master reading, even with exposure to print-rich environments and good teaching, a developmentally appropriate expectation is for most children to achieve beginning conventional reading (also called early reading) by age seven. For children with disabilities or special learning needs, achievable but challenging goals for their individual reading and writing development in an inclusive environment are established by teachers, families, and specialists working in collaboration (DEC Task Force 1993; DEC/CEC 1994).
IRA and NAEYC believe that early childhood teachers need to understand the developmental continuum of reading and writing and be skilled in a variety of strategies to assess and support individual children's development and learning across the continuum. At the same time teachers must set developmentally appropriate literacy goals for young children and then adapt instructional strategies for children whose learning and development are advanced or lag behind those goals. Good teachers make instructional decisions based on their knowledge of reading and writing, current research, appropriate expectations, and their knowledge of individual children's strengths and needs.
A continuum of reading and writing development is useful for identifying challenging but achievable goals or benchmarks for children's literacy learning, remembering that individual variation is to be expected and supported. Using a developmental continuum enables teachers to assess individual children's progress against realistic goals and then adapt instruction to ensure that children continue to progress. During the preschool years most children can be expected to function in phase 1 of the developmental continuum, Awareness and Exploration. In kindergarten an appropriate expectation is that most children will be at phase 2, Experimental Reading and Writing. By the end of first grade, most children will function in phase 3, Early Reading and Writing. An appropriate expectation for second grade is Transitional Reading and Writing (phase 4), while the goal for third grade is Independent and Productive Reading and Writing (phase 5). Advanced Reading is the goal for fourth grade and above.
As fundamental as the principle of individual variation is the principle that human development and learning occur in and are influenced by social and cultural contexts. Language, reading, and writing are strongly shaped by culture. Children enter early childhood programs or schools having learned to communicate and make sense of their experiences at home and in their communities. When the ways of making and communicating meaning are similar at home and in school, children's transitions are eased. However, when the language and culture of the home and school are not congruent, teachers and parents must work together to help children strengthen and preserve their home language and culture while acquiring skills needed to participate in the shared culture of the school (NAEYC 1996a).
Most important, teachers must understand how children learn a second language and how this process applies to young children's literacy development. Teachers need to respect the child's home language and culture and use it as a base on which to build and extend children's language and literacy experiences. Unfortunately teachers too often react negatively to children's linguistic and cultural diversity, equating difference with deficit. Such situations hurt children whose abilities within their own cultural context are not recognized because they do not match the cultural expectations of the school. Failing to recognize children's strengths or capabilities, teachers may underestimate their competence. Competence is not tied to any particular language, dialect, or culture. Teachers should never use a child's dialect, language, or culture as a basis for making judgments about the child's intellect or capability. Linguistically and culturally diverse children bring multiple perspectives and impressive skills, such as code-switching (the ability to go back and forth between two languages to deepen conceptual understanding), to the tasks of learning to speak, read, and write a second language. These self-motivated, self-initiating, constructive thinking processes should be celebrated and used as rich teaching and learning resources for all children.
Collaboration between IRA and NAEYC is symbolic of the coming together of the two essential bodies of knowledge necessary to support literacy development of young children: knowledge about the processes of reading and writing and knowledge of child development and learning. Developmentally appropriate practices (Bredekamp & Copple 1997) in reading and writing are ways of teaching that consider:
- what is generally known about children's development and learning to set achievable but challenging goals for literacy learning and to plan learning experiences and teaching strategies that vary with the age and experience of the learners
- results of ongoing assessment of individual children's progress in reading and writing to plan next steps or to adapt instruction when children fail to make expected progress or are at advanced levels
- social and cultural contexts in which children live so as to help them make sense of their learning experiences in relation to what they already know and are able to do
To teach in developmentally appropriate ways, teachers must understand both the continuum of reading and writing development and children's individual and cultural variations. Teachers must recognize when variation is within the typical range and when intervention is necessary, because early intervention is more effective and less costly than later remediation.
Learning to read and write is one of the most important and powerful achievements in life. Its value is clearly seen in the faces of young children the proud, confident smile of the capable reader contrasts sharply with the furrowed brow and sullen frown of the discouraged nonreader.
Ensuring that all young children reach their potentials as readers and writers is the shared responsibility of teachers, administrators, families, and communities. Educators have a special responsibility to teach every child and not to blame children, families, or each other when the task is difficult. All responsible adults need to work together to help children become competent readers and writers.
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Adams, M. 1990. Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Anbar, A. 1986. Reading acquisition of preschool children without systematic instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 1: 6983.
Anderson, R.C. 1995. Research foundations for wide reading. Paper presented at invitational conference on "The Impact of Wide Reading" at Center for the Study of Reading, Urbana, IL.
Applebee, A.N. 1977. Writing and reading. Language Arts 20: 53437.
Barnett, W.S. 1995. Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children 5: 2550.
Barron, R.W. 1980. Visual and phonological strategies in reading and spelling. In Cognitive processes in spelling, ed. U. Frith, 33953. New York: Academic.
Berk, L. 1996. Infants and children: Prenatal through middle childhood. 2d ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bissex, G. 1980. GYNS AT WRK: A child learns to write and read. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bond, G., & R. Dykstra. 1967. The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly 2: 5142.
Bradley, L., & P.E. Bryant. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature 301: 41921.
Bredekamp, S., & C. Copple, eds. 1997. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Brown, A.L., & J.S. DeLoache. 1978. Skills, plans and self-regulation. In Children's thinking: What develops? ed. R. Siegler, 336. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bryant, P.E., M. MacLean, L. Bradley, & J. Crossland. 1990. Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology 26: 42938.
Bryne, B., & R. Fielding-Barnsley. 1991. Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 45155.
Bryne, B., & R. Fielding-Barnsley. 1993. Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 10411.
Bryne, B., & R. Fielding-Barnsley. 1995. Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology 87: 488503.
Bus, A., J. Belsky, M.H. van IJzendoorn, & K. Crnic. 1997. Attachment and book-reading patterns: A study of mothers, fathers, and their toddlers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 12: 8198.
Bus, A., & M. Van IJzendoorn. 1995. Mothers reading to their 3-year-olds: The role of mother-child attachment security in becoming literate. Reading Research Quarterly 30: 9981015.
Bus, A., M. Van IJzendoorn, & A. Pellegrini. 1995. Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research 65: 121.
Chomsky, C. 1979. Approaching reading through invented spelling. In Theory and practice of early reading, vol. 2, eds. L.B. Resnick & P.A. Weaver, 4365. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clarke, L. 1988. Invented versus traditional spelling in first graders' writings: Effects on learning to spell and read. Research in the Teaching of English 22: 281309.
Clay, M. 1975. What did I write? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clay, M. 1979. The early detection of reading difficulties. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clay, M. 1991. Becoming literate. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cost, Quality, and Child Outcomes Study Team. 1995. Cost, quality, and child outcomes in child care centers, public report. 2d ed. Denver: Economics Department, University of Colorado, Denver.
Cummins, J. 1979. Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research 49: 22251.
Cunningham, A. 1990. Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50: 42944.
Darling-Hammond, L. 1997. Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
DEC/CEC (Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children). 1994. Position on inclusion. Young Children 49 (5): 78.
DEC (Division for Early Childhood) Task Force on Recommended Practices. 1993. DEC recommended practices: Indicators of quality in programs for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Dickinson, D., & M. Smith. 1994. Long-term effects of preschool teachers' book readings on low-income children's vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 29: 10422.
Domico, M.A. 1993. Patterns of development in narrative stories of emergent writers. In Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice, eds. C. Kinzer & D. Leu, 391404. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Durkin, D. 1966. Children who read early. New York: Teachers College Press.
Durrell, D.D., & J.H. Catterson. 1980. Durrell analysis of reading difficulty. Rev. ed. New York: Psychological Corp.
Dyson, A.H. 1988. Appreciate the drawing and dictating of young children. Young Children 43 (3): 2532. Education Department of Western Australia. 1994a. First Steps reading developmental continuum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Education Department of Western Australia. 1994b. First Steps writing developmental continuum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Education Department of Western Australia. 1994c. First Steps spelling developmental continuum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Education Department of Western Australia. 1994d. First Steps oral language developmental continuum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Ehri, L. 1994. Development of the ability to read words: Update. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, eds. R. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer, 32358. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Ehri, L.C., & C. Robbins. 1992. Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly 27: 1326.
Ehri, L., & J. Sweet. 1991. Finger-point reading of memorized text: What enables beginners to process the print? Reading Research Quarterly 26: 44261.
Elkonin, D.B. 1973. USSR. In Comparative Reading, ed. J. Downing, 55180. New York: Macmillan.
Eller, R., C. Pappas, & E. Brown. 1988. The lexical development of kindergartners: Learning from written context. Journal of Reading Behavior 20: 524.
Elley, W. 1989. Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly 24: 17487.
Feitelson, D., B. Kita, & Z. Goldstein. 1986. Effects of listening to series stories on first graders' comprehension and use of language. Research in the Teaching of English 20: 33955.
Foorman, B., D. Novy, D. Francis, & D. Liberman. 1991. How letter-sound instruction mediates progress in first-grade reading and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 45669.
Galinsky, E., C. Howes, S. Kontos., & M. Shinn. 1994. The study of children in family child care and relative care: Highlights of findings. New York: Families and Work Institute.
Gibson, E., & E. Levin. 1975. The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Graves, D. 1983. Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hannon, P. 1995. Literacy, home and school. London: Falmer.
Hanson, R., & D. Farrell. 1995. The long-term effects on high school seniors of learning to read in kindergarten. Reading Research Quarterly 30: 90833.
Hart, B., & T. Risley. 1995. Meaningful differences. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
Henderson, E.H., & J.W. Beers. 1980. Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Holdaway, D. 1979. The foundations of literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Howes, C., D.A. Phillips, & M. Whitebook. 1992. Thresholds of quality: Implications for the social development of children in center-based child care. Child Development 63: 44960.
IRA (International Reading Association). 1998. Phonics in the early reading program: A position statement. Newark, DE: Author.
Johnston, P. 1997. Knowing literacy: Constructive literacy assessment. York, ME: Stenhouse.
Juel, C. 1991. Beginning reading. In Handbook of reading research, vol. 2, eds. R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson, 75988. New York: Longman.
Juel, C., P.L. Griffith, & P. Gough. 1986. Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 24355.
Kagan, S.L., & N. Cohen. 1997. Not by chance: Creating an early care and education system for America's children. New Haven, CT: Bush Center in Child Development and Social Policy, Yale University.
Karweit, N., & B. Wasik. 1996. The effects of story reading programs on literacy and language development of disadvantaged pre-schoolers. Journal of Education for Students Placed At-Risk 4: 31948.
Katz, L., & C. Chard. 1989. Engaging children's minds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Layzer, J., B. Goodson, & M. Moss. 1993. Life in preschool: Volume one of an observational study of early childhood programs for disadvantaged four-year-olds. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Leung, C.B., & J.J. Pikulski. 1990. Incidental learning of word meanings by kindergarten and first grade children thorough repeated read aloud events. In Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms, eds. J. Zutell & S. McCormick, 23140. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Lundberg, I., J. Frost, & O.P. Petersen. 1988. Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly 23: 26384.
Maclean, M., P. Bryant, & L. Bradley. 1987. Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33: 25581.
Mason, J. 1980. When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old children's word reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly 15: 20327.
Mason, J., & S. Sinha. 1993. Emerging literacy in the early childhood years: Applying a Vygotskian model of learning and development. In Handbook of research on the education of young children, ed. B. Spodek, 13750. New York: Macmillan.
McGee, L., R. Lomax, & M. Head. 1988. Young children's written language knowledge: What environmental and functional print reading reveals. Journal of Reading Behavior 20: 99118.
McGee, L., & D. Richgels. 1996. Literacy's beginnings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
McGill-Franzen, A., & C. Lanford. 1994. Exposing the edge of the preschool curriculum: Teachers' talk about text and children's literary understandings. Language Arts 71: 26473.
Morrow, L.M. 1988. Young children's responses to one-to-one readings in school settings. Reading Research Quarterly 23: 89107.
Morrow, L.M. 1990. Preparing the classroom environment to promote literacy during play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 5: 53754.
Morrow, L.M., D. Strickland, & D.G. Woo. 1998. Literacy instruction in half- and whole-day kindergarten. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Morrow, L.M., & C. Weinstein. 1986. Encouraging voluntary reading: The impact of a literature program on children's use of library centers. Reading Research Quarterly 21: 33046.
Moyer, S.B. 1982. Repeated reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities 15: 61923.
NAEYC. 1996a. NAEYC position statement: Responding to linguistic and cultural diversity--Recommendations for effective early childhood education. Young Children 51 (2): 412.
NAEYC. 1996b. NAEYC position statement: Technology and young children--Ages three through eight. Young Children 51 (6): 1116.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 1996. The condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Neuman, S.B. 1997. Literary research that makes a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 32 (April-June): 202-10.
Neuman, S.B. 1998. How can we enable all children to achieve? In Children achieving: Best practices in early literacy, eds. S.B. Neuman & K. Roskos. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Neuman, S.B., & K. Roskos. 1992. Literacy objects as cultural tools: Effects on children's literacy behaviors in play. Reading Research Quarterly 27: 20225.
Neuman, S.B., & K. Roskos. 1993. Access to print for children of poverty: Differential effects of adult mediation and literacy-enriched play settings on environmental and functional print tasks. American Educational Research Journal 30: 95122.
Neuman, S.B., & K. Roskos. 1997. Literacy knowledge in practice: Contexts of participation for young writers and readers. Reading Research Quarterly 32: 1032.
Nye, B.A., J. Boyd-Zaharias, & B.D. Fulton. 1994. The lasting benefits study: A continuing analysis of the effect of small class size in kindergarten through third grade on student achievement test scores in subsequent grade levels--seventh grade (199293), Technical report. Nashville: Center of Excellence for Research in Basic Skills, Tennessee State University.
Nye, B.A., J. Boyd-Zaharias, B.D. Fulton, & M.P. Wallenhorst. 1992. Smaller classes really are better. The American School Board Journal 179 (5): 3133.
Pappas, C. 1991. Young children's strategies in learning the "book language" of information books. Discourse Processes 14: 20325.
Read, C. 1971. Pre-school children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review 41: 134.
Richgels, D.J. 1986. Beginning first graders' "invented spelling" ability and their performance in functional classroom writing activities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 1: 8597.
Richgels, D.J. 1995. Invented spelling ability and printed word learning in kindergarten. Reading Research Quarterly 30: 96109.
Riley, J. 1996. The teaching of reading. London: Paul Chapman.
Roberts, B. 1998. "I No EverethENGe": What skills are essential in early literacy? In Children achieving: Best practices in early literacy, eds. S.B. Neuman & K. Roskos. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Rowe, D.W. 1994. Preschoolers as authors. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Samuels, S.J. 1979. The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher 32: 40308.
Shepard, L. 1994. The challenges of assessing young children appropriately. Phi Delta Kappan 76: 20613.
Shepard, L., S.L. Kagan, & E. Wurtz, eds. 1998. Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
Shepard, L., & M.L. Smith. 1988. Escalating academic demand in kindergarten: Some nonsolutions. Elementary School Journal 89: 13546.
Shepard, L., & M.L. Smith. 1989. Flunking grades: Research and policies on Retention. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Snow, C. 1991. The theoretical basis for relationships between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 6: 510.
Snow, C., M.S. Burns, & P. Griffin. 1998. Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Snow, C., P. Tabors, P. Nicholson, & B. Kurland. 1995. SHELL: Oral language and early literacy skills in kindergarten and first-grade children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 10: 3748.
Stanovich, K.E. 1986. Matthew Effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360406.
Stanovich, K.E., & R.F. West. 1989. Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly 24: 40233.
Stauffer, R. 1970. The language experience approach to the teaching of reading. New York: Harper & Row.
Strickland, D. 1994. Educating African American learners at risk: Finding a better way. Language Arts 71: 32836.
Sulzby, E. 1985. Kindergartners as writers and readers. In Advances in writing research, ed. M.Farr, 12799. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Teale, W. 1984. Reading to young children: Its significance for literacy development. In Awakening to literacy, eds. H. Goelman, A. Oberg, & F. Smith, 11021. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Tierney, R., & T. Shanahan. 1991. Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In Handbook on reading research, vol. 2, eds. R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson, 24680. New York: Longman.
Vernon-Feagans, L., D. Emanuel, & I. Blood. 1992. About middle ear problems: The effect of otitis media and quality of day care on children's language development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 18: 395409.
Vukelich, C. 1994. Effects of play interventions on young children's reading of environmental print. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 9: 15370.
Wagner, R., & J. Torgesen. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin 101: 192212.
Wells, G. 1985. The meaning makers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Whitehurst, G., D. Arnold, J. Epstein, A. Angell, M. Smith, & J. Fischel. 1994. A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology 30: 67989.
Whitmore, K., & Y. Goodman. 1995. Transforming curriculum in language and literacy. In Reaching potentials: Transforming early childhood curriculum and assessment, vol. 2, eds. S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Wong Fillmore, L. 1991. When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 6: 32346.